Home

My daughter is a high school junior, so we have started to visit colleges that she might be interested in attending. I’ve enjoyed the visits, and I’ve found the admissions staff and the student guides to be helpful, informative, enthusiastic, and so on. It’s just what you’d expect from people who are trying to promote their product.

But there’s one area in which I’ve been very surprised at how indifferent colleges are to their target audiences of high schoolers and their parents. The colleges take breaks of two weeks or more during which they do not offer any form of in-person admissions advice or tours. We encountered this phenomenon as we drove through the South during the Christmas break and passed within 20 miles of several colleges that are on my daughter’s wish list. (We drove from the Washington, DC, area to Atlanta.)

Students were on vacation, of course. And staff would be expected to take some downtime during the holidays, too. But the schools were basically locked and boarded up from about December 20 to well into January. For example, my daughter is interested in Clemson University in Clemson, SC. A few days after Christmas, we took a detour from the highway to visit the campus, even though we knew it wasn’t open for business. We drove and walked for about an hour, and we saw perhaps 10 people on the beautiful campus. Not a building was open. Even the bike racks were empty.

Now, think about this for a moment. Schools are trying to convince us to “purchase” a product that costs as much as a luxury car or a town home in many parts of the country. Yet, they are completely shut down for weeks at a time, right when we are likely to have the time to shop. It’s shocking.

Clemson is about a 9-hour drive from our house. Other Southern schools on my daughter’s wish list are a 5- or 6-hour drive from our home. Given the distances, we wouldn’t just casually decide to visit them on a Saturday afternoon. So at a time when we were traveling anyway (we and millions of others), it would have been convenient to be able to have a full visit at these schools, even if students were not on campus.

My recommendation is that school admission departments have a skeleton staff available to do tours during the holiday break. One tour a day would be sufficient, accompanied by a guard who can unlock doors for a quick walk through key buildings.

Not only would it be greatly appreciated, but it might induce a few more applicants. And before anyone in admissions cries hardship, I’d note that every other business seems to find a way to operate through the holidays, even if it’s at a reduced schedule. My local YMCA, which surely pays its staff far less than does a university, can operate every day but Christmas. Why can’t a university’s admissions department?

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Why Do Universities Ignore Their Market?

  1. Interesting observation. I wonder how much demand there would really be? Something to look into. Our university goes into reduced energy mode from December 24 to January 2, so the buildings get rather dark and cool. Also, the roads, walkways and parking lots are not plowed and sanded, so not quite as simple as having a couple of staff members available.

    • Good points. We visited a school in the southern U.S., so some of those issues aren’t as relevant. And maybe offering mini-tours doesn’t make sense for schools that are in areas that are too cold, too geographically isolated, and so on.

      Still, I assume that all buildings are somewhat heated during the holidays, both to avoid freezing pipes and because maintenance and cleaning people are likely to be doing their work. A visitor might be merely taken into the lobby of the student union and the library, rather than getting a full walk-through. It’s not a full visit, but it’s better than encountering locked buildings and no staff member onsite.

  2. I wonder if there would be better service at schools which are trying to get enough applicants. Schools like Clemson probably get all they need. Also, I can’t help but wonder if there isn’t a covert screening process, ie, are you affluent enough to take off work and come here–not affordable for many, many families. Schools say they don’t take financial need into account, but there are many, many ways they can gauge the amount of money a family has at their disposal. For selective colleges, it’s a sellers market.

    • My understanding is that all schools want as many applicants as possible because it’s the denominator in their ratio of acceptances-to-applicants. In other words, the more applicants they get, the more selective they appear because their acceptance rate is lower. So it would seem to me that schools should do whatever they can to get kids to apply, and then sort out acceptances and financial aid later.

      Shutting down for several weeks around the holidays is part of the university culture. But I think that part of the culture is kind of strange; I can’t think of another industry that ignores its customers for weeks at a time, especially at a time when they are likely to be able to check them out. Improving visitor access might be a good new marketing tool. It’s surely cheaper for a school to pay one admissions person to work for a few days during the holidays than it is to continue the “arms race” of building new athletic facilities or a student union.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s